Ted Cruz Criticizes ICC Over Netanyahu Arrest Warrant, Calls It a Major Blunder

Senator Ted Cruz of the United States of America has issued a vehement criticism of the International Criminal Court (ICC), describing the most recent ruling made by the court as a “catastrophic mistake.” In reaction to comments he made during an interview with Jewish Insider, in which he attacked the actions of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as being both politicised and unjust, he made these further remarks....CONTINUE READING>>>

“The ICC already lacks legitimacy, but with this bigoted and politicized decision, the ICC has turned itself into a kangaroo court,” Cruz reportedly told Jewish Insider. In a striking rhetorical jab, he added, “That, frankly, is unfair to kangaroos.”

The comments are a reflection of Cruz’s ongoing opposition to the International Criminal Court (ICC), which he and other critics have accused of being biased and overreaching, particularly in regard to investigations and verdicts that are related to Israel and its governing officials. A sensitive issue that has received worldwide focus is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and Cruz’s statement comes at a time when there is a rising debate regarding the role of the Worldwide Criminal Court (ICC) in handling alleged war crimes in the conflict.

The Texas senator doubled down on his criticism in a subsequent tweet, declaring, “The ICC has made a catastrophic mistake.” Cruz’s remarks align with sentiments often expressed by U.S. lawmakers who argue that the ICC undermines democratic nations while failing to address atrocities committed by authoritarian regimes.

Israel has been accused of being singled out for prosecution by the International Criminal Court (ICC), whereas other states have been accused of committing serious offences. It is argued by those who are in favour of the court that it is an essential international instrument for holding persons accountable for crimes against humanity and war crimes. Cruz and other sceptics, on the other hand, argue that the choices of the administration frequently reflect political prejudice rather than unbiased justice.